Friday, 30 January 2015

Into the world, As a Global Citizen

Although this will be my last post for this blog, it will not be the end of me as a Global Citizen. In fact, it is just the beginning. Prior to completing this course my expectations of my learning were quite low as I honestly rated myself as a competent global citizen. Instead I have been overwhelmed by the value of this course in reshaping and defining my beliefs on global citizenship and issues of global importance. Instead I have learnt that global citizenship is an ongoing and iterative process that I can continue to benefit from for the rest of my life.

In particularly, the biggest thing I take from this course is the way in which it has changed the way I think about global issues and myself as a global citizen. I have learnt the highly valuable ability to cautiously reassess my actions and expectations as a global citizen to continually develop myself as a better person to contribute to a better society.

My course work focused on the following topics:
-          Defining Global Citizenship
-          Globalisation and History
-          Ethics, Leadership and Global Citizenship
-          Challenges to Global Citizenship
-          World issues of concern to Global Citizens, and
-          Participation and Action as a Global Citizen in the workplace

But what I learnt is much more than this. I learnt of the interrelationship and synthesis between thse ideas, and how one topic impacts the other. For instance, how events that occurred as a result of globalisation have affected our collective thoughts on human rights and how we respond to these issues globally as global citizens.


Overall, this has left me much more confidentially and reassured of how I can conduct myself as a global citizen and contribute to the global as a better member of society. I have really been challenged by this course on many different levels and found it both refreshing and insightful to learn a dramatic amount about our world, our people and our collective values.

La revedere. au revoir and adios.

Friday, 23 January 2015

What is Just and what is right?

Recently I undertook a trip back to Romania, my home country to be reacquainted with my extended family. During my time there I was taken on an inner journey that really called into question a lot of my actions, goals and career path. Without thinking it at the time, retrospectively I believe I have become a lot more self-aware as a result of this course. In Romania I was lucky enough to have lovely family time, see many of the great sites, eat great food and have wonderful and memorable experiences.

Many of these experiences were slightly tarnished by the poverty and squalor. Scenes of “gypsy” children begging on the street in tattered clothing and dirty in appearance stuck with me, imprinted at the forefront of my mind. Identifying as Romanian by birth and Australian by right it was interesting to see how I related to empathetically to this situation. How could I be so happy, in a country when there are these problems right in front of me?

Similarly, it was intriguing to see how, as a global citizen I saw beyond my category, social class and race of people to understand that these children where the same as me. Surely they should have the same opportunities and benefits that I have. At the very minimum, surely they should have access to basic human needs, shelter, food, water and healthcare. In this instance, I believe I was not a tourist, nor a traveller but both, being able to see both the good and bad in the situation.

This allowed me to call into question my career direction and how I can use my career in Biomedical Engineering as a global citizen to give back to my community in Australia, Romania and Globally.

As a direct result of this experience I called into question the very relationship between globalisation and global citizenship. In particular, how our wrong doings in the past have shaped how we conduct our justice and human rights into the future. But more so, how globalisation may have benefited us through our past wrong doings, that will in turn mean that some “groups” of society have experienced negative events done on to them and therefore may have a completely different understanding of justice and human rights then what we do now. It is therefore this gap in what we consider humane and right versus what others consider correct that presents a large challenge for global citizens.

For this reason, it is for very good reason we have organisations such as the UN and the Global Human Rights Defence to promote the rights of everyone, separate of skin colour, social standing or wealth. By the same idea, it is interesting to examine the ways in which technology has shaped our collective ideas of human rights and social justice. The impact of technology on promoting awareness for global issues is nothing short of phenomenal. From the expressions of distaste of our own refugee policies to the kidnapping of over 200 Nigerian girls, technology has allowed a large network of global citizens to band together against any issue in real time. This has been a subtle yet fundamental approach to governments changing policy and organisations changing practices and so on. This is an effect we are only beginning to see the full effects of, surely this is something we will see this continue to trend as third world and poverty stricken countries acquire better access to technology and internet.

Therefore, to move forward with Globalisation and to produce stronger global citizens it is essential we develop a globally accepted set of human rights, morals and ethics to ensure we can collectively act as truly global and responsibly cosmopolitan. As such this begs me to ask the question, how do we as Global Citizens conduct justice? This is something that leaves me highly confused; do we conduct justice in a democratic, judge and jury based legal system in which we can be exposed to political bias and corruption. In addition, do we turn our backs completely on capital punishment? Or do we completely redirect our efforts for justice into methods for rehabilitation?


As a result, we still have many ongoing challenges in regard to social justice and human rights and there interplay with Globalisation and global citizenship. In the future, it will be interesting to see the direction we take as global citizens in mitigating the loss felt by many around the world through maximising education, technology and leveraging our governments as global entities.

Friday, 16 January 2015

The too hard basket - My thoughts on Global Citizenship

Over the course of my investigation into Global Citizenship I have learnt many surprising things. One such thing is the importance we place on Global Citizenship. More so, I am talking about the acknowledgement we all give to Global Citizenship in being an integral part of our present and the future of our world. But I question if this acknowledgement is really enough? And in turn are we really doing enough for Global Citizenship?

My development as a Global Citizenship has really made me view it as “another” political issue that is always talked about, but lacks real substance, action and a driving force. I have developed these questions as a result of countless authors dictating the same story that Global Citizenship come second. That’s not to say we can’t always be doing more as global citizens, because obviously this is an ideal that is never always complete.

By driving force, I mean we are lacking substantial leadership for this ideal that we all seem to suggest is essential. Whilst we do have some key people pushing for global citizenship (Obama, Angelina Jolie, Malala Yousafzai etc.) we lack a real banding of highly recognised individuals developing the cause. In our current dynamic we are focused on technology being the main platform to bring together a community of global citizens through issue awareness. This has been made evident through viral effects such as the #illridewithyou campaign in recent time. And whilst this is not necessarily a bad thing it lacks vision and direction for global citizenship in the future.

This is a major key challenge for global citizenship. As a collective we struggle to even define global citizenship. And while some authors such as Brigham (2011) define global citizens as someone who has a sense of the wider world and their own role as a citizen to the world we still lack a globally agreed definition of what a global citizen does, looks like and acts. In a way I can really criticise our global citizenship literature for not providing a means of global perspective on developing common ground on this issue or providing innovative ways to achieve even a common definition. To some extent is definitely appears like people are prepared to talk about the idea, but afraid to be innovators in providing action for global citizenship, or there is always something else “more important” and the ideal is “thrown in the too hard basket”.

This is particularly amplified throughout the debate on global citizenship education. Pike and Davies (2009) illustrate the growing significance of global citizenship education being discussed as a result of globalisation. However, as is the same with political issues surrounding global citizenship we are often focused as a nation on providing education that is more closely aligned to producing university graduates, trades people and jobs in general to strengthen our own individual economies (Howler,1999-2015). This is counterproductive for global citizenship as the countries patriotism keeps them nation focused, rather then focusing globally on the global economy and benefits of global citizenship education.

As a result, one key challenge we face as global citizens is whose responsibility. Is it my responsibility? Or yours? If I don’t do it, surely someone else will? Or maybe I don’t have the time to act as a global citizen? I believe the real answer to these questions can be explained with one other question. Where does global citizenship start? In my opinion, global citizenship starts at home. David Brower once said “think globally, act locally”. Therefore the initial responsibility to teach themes of global citizenship is born on to the parents not the educators. Similarly, the Igbo and Yoruba proverb can be applied to illustrate that “it takes a village to raise a child” and as a result it is everyone’s responsibility to contribute to creating global citizens.

However, I do acknowledge that while there is no set curriculum or concrete structure to teach global citizenship it is in one way difficult for parents or care givers to pass on this knowledge. This is where we really need to utilise or morals and ethics and focus on developing children that are globally aware through the maximisation of technology to leverage global issues.

This is where we start to call in other problems that are associated challenges to global citizenship, such as racism and discrimination, issues of justice and human rights. The fact that one is willing to help their own colour or category over another. Global citizenship is a shared responsibility.

As a shared responsibility, we can also dictate the fact that organisations have a responsibility to act as global citizens, just as any other person. My previous post alluded to some organisations who are innovators in their field at corporate social responsibility. The contribution to corporate social responsibility is essential because as organisations we can collectively achieve more for global citizenship. It is much more than the idea of fixing what we may be hindering through our day-to-day operation and presents a chance for a collective of people to help many more.

In conclusion, we have made some real in roads into maximising global citizenship. In the future I believe we can capitalize on this by rallying organisations and government to start thinking beyond their nation and beyond there term.
References:

(1.)  Brigham, M (2011) “Creating a Global Citizen and Assessing Outcomes”, Journal of Global Citizenship & Equity Education, Vol 1, No 1

(2.)  Pike and Davies (2009) “The handbook of Practice and Research in Study Abroad – Higher Education and the Quest for Global Citizenship”, Taylor and Francis

(3.)  Howler (1999-2015) “The making of a Global Citizen”, Interim President & Faculty, Center for Creative Change, Antioch University – Seattle, WA [Located online: http://www.compact.org/resources/future-of-campus-engagement/the-making-of-a-global-citizen/4260/]

Tuesday, 6 January 2015

Global Organisations:

Researching globalisation and global citizenship got me thinking about how a group of individuals with similar ideas of global citizenship can combine to benefit the world on a larger scale. Similarly, this allowed me to explore the roles organisations have in becoming and promoting global citizenship.

Below are three major global organisations whose activities and interactions promote individual and group ideals of global citizenship.

WHO:  The world health organisation focuses on equal access to basic health care treatment and recognises the shared responsibility in eradicating health threats. WHO provides direction on global health matters, conducts research into health care problems and attempts to set standards in the health care industry. In addition, WHO investigate and keeps track of world health trends to provide publications on pressing health topics. For more information on WHO visit their website here (http://www.who.int/en/)

An organisation like the World Health Organisation is essential in increasing the quality of life of everyone. This may be through direct contact with people in improvised conditions but more powerful is the effect such an organisation has through global citizenship education. That is raising awareness and leading by example through research and publications to highlight the way in which individuals and organisations should target issues that concern global citizens.

UNESCO:  UNESCO is an organisation that promotes peace and human rights. UNESCO was created on the premise that political agreements were not sustainable in achieving peace and agreements need to be forged on morality.  This indicates that UNESCO’s values are primarily about recognising global human harmony despite our non-intrinsic differences; the definition of global citizenship we have been learning about. UNESCO’s activities are primarily about facilitating networks been groups of countries to make better decisions about social, environmental and economic sustainability through peace and collaboration. In addition UNESCO aids in providing global citizenship education through addressing cross cultural barriers and also attempts to gain cooperative consensus on issues of scientific nature. More about UNESCO can be found here (http://en.unesco.org/)

Granted the fact that WHO and UNESCO are widely known as organisations with a strong focus on global citizenship I wanted to highlight that there are a diverse range of companies that have integrated and recognised a degree of corporate social responsibility within the realms of their own business processes. In some instances this could mean being aware of the limited resources being used in a business’s supply chain and actively searching for alternative resources, creating equality amongst wage’s rather than utilising regimes such as slave labour or investing time and resources in community and charity based activity. Hewlett Packard is one such company.

HP:  Hewlett Packard has an entire webpage dedicated to its suite of global citizenship practices. These practices are based on the paradigms of human, economic and environmental ideals. As a major technology company, Hewlett Packard are constantly illustrating the way in which technology can influence globalisation and global citizenship. HP has undertaken a human rights risk assessment and published the results to indicate how HP stakeholders are effected throughout the supply chain. HP eloquently raises the point that “Rapid advances in technology and business models are outpacing governments’ ability to agree on how to regulate the growing data industry” and speaks of the need for technology companies to make decisions ethically and with social responsibility to maximise the potential of technology to support human progress. To see the range of great things Hewlett Packard are doing in this space and how they conducting themselves as global citizens see here (http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/global-citizenship/index.html)

More Companies with Global Citizenship emphasis:
- Ford Motors (http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/ford-center.aspx

After researching and reflecting on these events, organisations and issues I have been thinking about how global citizenship might look in the future. For instance, Global Citizenship may entail the governance of global organisations. In addition, global citizenship may become known through ideas such as a global government, global currency and global health and education policies. Similarly, the future may see ways in which technology shapes and dictates globalization and movements of global citizenship as global citizens develop new ways to contact each other, share information and promote ideas. This may also provide a further system for checks and balances for organisations and governments to step up with corporate social responsibility.

Sunday, 4 January 2015

Global Policies and Government/Global Initiatives:


Over the past few years we have witnesses an increase in the global community and global leaders coming together to respond to global issues. As such, I have provided below a summary of a few global policies and initiatives I have learnt about as part of my individual research in Global Citizenship. Dissimilarly, many government policies and initiatives have sent us in the wrong direction on our journey for Global Citizenship. As part of my research I will also explore these as challenges to Global Citizenship.

G20:  The G20 Summit
The G20 is an international summit consisting of 19 countries and several world banks to conduct global responsibility greater than any one organisation with the ambition of making decisions that strengthen the international economy. Such policies have a benefit for everyone as economically speaking a stronger economy will allow more jobs, better wages and more opportunities for everyone. As the G20 nations make up a considerable amount of the world economy the platform is integral for discussions on world trade. The 2014 summit facilitated key conversations on the idea of a global trading system. Such a system would see a boom in local economies and an increase in global trade and would have enormous effects on globalisation, particular within those of emerging economies. It provides itself as a forum for countries to possibly overcome some of their barriers to global citizenship and potentially act as better global citizens. More information on the G20 can be found here (http://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/g20/)

Health:
              Australia:  Australian healthcare is ranked amongst the best in the world. This is a result of our publicly funded health care system that provides basic level medical support to all Australian citizens. Additionally, citizens may opt to purchase private health care to gain cover for services that are not included as part of the policy (e.g. dentistry). Such a system ensures that everyone regardless of socioeconomic status has access to medical treatment. More information on the Australian health care system can be found here (http://apo.org.au/commentary/health-policy-australia)

              US (Obamacare): Traditionally, the United states has been known for having a poor health care system. More recently a push by the Obama government has pushed for an “affordable health care” system. The policy aims to create a more affordable health care system through regulation, subsidies and taxes that should eliminate the unethical practices of for-profit healthcare providers. This kind of political reform highlights how as global citizens we can recognise the need and the benefit of political policy is providing services that fulfil basic human needs. An informative video on Obamacare can be found here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQG8eZs8AJc)

Personally, I believe that sound policy on health allows countries to fulfil their social obligation to each other. For this reason I believe that health care systems that are based on tax payers money being invested into this industry is a fundamental way of providing the basic cover that individuals need to survive. My own experience while travelling to my home country as an adult now has widened my world completely on this area.  In Romania it is a common cultural norm to bribe or give gifts to medical practitioners to receive health care treatment.  This is simply outrageous as it unfortunately means that many people from lower socio-economic backgrounds receive no medical care for diseases that can easily be remedied with western medicine.

Refugee Policy:
                             Australia: Migration and Refugee policy has always been a debateable topic in Australia for a long time. Recently, the Abbott government has released a refugee policy commonly known as the “stop the boats” campaign that has been described as both merciless and punitive (The Age, 2014). The policy of which has gained global criticism because of its in humain “turn back” tactics that often leave asylum seekers with no government assistance. The legal capacity of Australian military to do so has also been questioned with the UN and Australian Human Rights Commission condemning the policy. The more devastating costs of the policy are outlined here (http://theconversation.com/the-boats-may-have-stopped-but-at-what-cost-to-australia-30455)

                             Pakistan:  Pakistan takes host of the most refugees in the world with a staggering 1.5 million registered. I found this particularly staggering in light of the attitude Australia has towards refugees, especially when I discovered that Pakistan provides land for refugees as well as education and healthcare. More importantly, Refugee’s and there refugee standards are increasingly on the Pakistan political agenda with a strong focus on creating real solutions for people exposed to emergency and conflict. More information on Pakistan’s refugee policy can be found here (http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49e487016.html)

Once again, global events tend to dictate the extent to which globalisation occurs. In some instances it is essential for humans to migrate from countries to avoid conflict. If this is the case, as global citizens I believe we have the responsibility to help out; not just in terms of financial aid or military aid as these are what I would call band aid solutions. In the same way I believe Australia has developed a phobia or foul attitude towards refugee crisis’ and unfortunately with the media attention we have recently received over the years with conditions in detention centres we have really tarnished our reputation on global citizenship.

Climate Change Policies:
Sweeden: In more recent times Sweeden has been put in the global spotlight for its Governments strong focus on climate change. The sweedish government has implemented measureable and strategic energy targets and objectives that promote an incredible increase in renewable energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The sweedish government also builds global awareness of the issue through climate conventions and talks with the EU to develop global action against climate change. For more on sweedens climate change policies see here (http://www.government.se/sb/d/5745)

Climate change is an issue that effects all of us. As a result of this Global Issue it is important for countries to act with a global attitude. This issue will now and in the future really dictate which countries are in fact true global citizens as countries like sweeten will acknowledge our individual responsibilities to the earth and each other to prevent climate change.


In assessing these policies and initiatives it has become clear that my definition of Global Citizenship has changed extensively to include the way in which our countries conduct themselves globally, particularly as compared to other countries. This has shown me our individual responsibly to lobby governments and organisations to better utilise resources to achieve higher standards of global citizenship in innovative, ethical and empathetic ways.

Friday, 2 January 2015

Events that have accelerated Global Citizenship

In learning about global citizenship, and what is to define and be considered a global citizenship I thought it important to assess how the world is moving towards global citizenship.  In doing so I have chosen to reflect on some world issues, organisations, governments and global policy that may be helping or hindering our movement towards a Global Future and provide some commentary and context on these over my next few blog posts.

UNICEF defines global citizenship as the responsibility of groups and individuals to stand against injustice. A global citizen also recognises and respects people regardless of differences and most importantly is aware of global issues and takes action on said issues. More so, my understanding of Global Citizenship is extended with ambitions of a global culture, a global economy and a global harmony that displays these values consistently worldwide.
Given the fact that we are in a new year it is the perfect time to reflect on 2014 and the issues and interactions that pushed us closer towards this idea of cohesive global citizenship.

Global Issues:

Ebola: 2014 saw the introduction and development of some key issues that forced the world to call into question its consistent level of global ethics and act cohesively and accordingly. One particular issue was the action against the Ebola virus. This saw the world react and band together to send foreign doctors, invest foreign aid and review medical practices in order to protect humanity. Whilst some might criticise the delay it took to react to the issue the world did have a relatively good response in isolating the issue. A global Ebola Response Coalition was also founded by a group of organisation to collectively respond to the outbreak. Similarly, a range of United Nations and several other countries have also banded together showing a global ethical consistency on the issue demonstrating the ability for many countries to put aside differences in yield of a greater cause.

Animal Conservation:  Animal conservation is always a large topic, 2014 was no exception. Interestingly, I would like to mention how technology is starting to play a bigger effort in how we can spread awareness of global issues as global citizens. This year we saw Prince William collaborate with United for Wildlife to release an Angry Birds game application for smart phone and portable devices. The application of which is a take off a virally popular game that will also allow players to learn of the problems facing our endangered species around the world. The video below depicts Price William and provides context on the cause.



Climate Change: Similarly, climate change has had an ongoing debate and not a lot of real traction of the last few years. It is important to note that while some countries have begun to tackle this issue individually there have been no real headways for a global response. This year saw one significant headway in the global effort for climate change in Australia. The G20 saw a push for president Obama to encourage countries to pledge global aid to the UN Green Climate Fund. Obama spoke of the responsibility of all countries as citizens of the world to contribute to this cause. This really resonated with me and raised the point that strong leadership is needed to raise awareness, question our ethics and produce actions of global citizens. The president’s address is shown below:


Airline tragedies: Unfortunately many issues happen every day that lead to less than pleasant circumstances. However, as with many of these terrible events some good tends to show itself. This was particularly evident with the combined search effort of 26 countries who came together in an attempt to find the missing aircraft. Our own leader, Prime Minister Tony Abbott spoke of how we “owe it to the families of the loved ones”. This helped to demonstrate our global responsibility to each other as global citizens regardless of differences and regardless of not knowing each other. It is these intrinsic level of ethics that allowed us to come together in such times to response to such events.

In a similar way we witnessed the relationship between global ethics and globalisation. In particular we observed a different way in which globalisation can effect international trade as a result of the MH17 airline tragedy and the ongoing conflict between Russia and the Ukraine. Subsequent to the tragedy we saw an unfolding of events that led to several countries taking action against Russia in the form of trade sanctions. These events illustrated the ways in which globalisation and becoming global citizens has shaped us and the way in which we respond to global issues. It will be interesting to assess the relationship between globalisation and effects of the restriction of trade. Watch this space!

Terrorism – In addition, Australia bore witness to an incredibly unfortunate event in late 2014 as the result of an ‘acclaimed’ terrorist. It was the aftermath of this and the global response on social media that was an incredible display of global citizenship. Initiatives such as the #illridewithyou campaign that went viral was an overwhelmingly intelligent way for global citizens to come together despite differences, to show respect for values and ethics and to move forward. The image below shows the effects of the campaign.


Similarly, images were shown around the world (and below) of the memorial placed at martin place that depicted the fact that we did not need to have a relationship with the people involved to empathetically feel sorrow. This also showed that regardless of our differences we can provide action against a larger cause.



In the next blog post I will provide some commentary and facts on some global policies and government initiatives that are providing enormous help for the global citizenship effort.


Sources:

Saturday, 27 December 2014

Globalisation – The Australian Story

In learning about Globalisation this semester I have been relating it to the Australian perspective, the Australian History; The story that is not made readily available in mainstream media nor masqueraded in our modern education system.

As previously understood, a large amount of a countries contemporary culture is the product of interactions with other cultures and countries as the result of migration, trade or conquest. In Australia’s case this has been the result. Many resources are available that depict this conquest and the atrocities that followed. In the same way, many more resources tell the story of modern day Australia; the multicultural hub of the world.

One such resource that really illustrates the negative effect of globalisation on Australia’s first peoples is the map depicting Aboriginal massacres (shown below) that appeared in Judith Monticone’s book “healing the land”.  The large amounts of Aboriginal men and women that were killed during the globalisation process is a story that is largely untold. Some records indicate that the Aboriginal population fell by an estimated between 1788 and 1900 (Aboriginalart, 2014). This is particularly an issue when Australia’s schools are focused on colonial mythologies of the development of Australia and patriotic issues such as war, The Eureka Stockade and Ned Kelly (Westaway, M. The Conversation). For a big part, this unfortunately means that the unjust treatment and acquisition of Australian land is realistically unknown by the general population of Australia.



In the same way, Australia’s first nation peoples were also exposed to issues such as slavery that emulate similarities between conquests in America, South American countries and many others. Open access to settler’s documents and government policies depicts the forced labour of Aboriginal men, women and children hidden behind ideas of “Aboriginal Protectionism” that by some accounts only ended in the 1970’s (abc, 2014). For illustrative purposes I have provides an image below that may shock some readers.

Another devastating issue that has recently grabbed a lot of media attention is the effect of the stolen generation. The stolen generation saw the implementation of Government policy that involved the removal of Aboriginal children from families in order to assimilate them into ‘White Australia’, this was largely seen as an attempt to breed out and eradicate Aboriginal Australia (The Stolen Generations, 2013). This process is well represented in the movie “Rabbit Proof fence” by Phillip Noyce. Unfortunately, this has led to a flow on effect with the displacement of many Aboriginals and generations of families who have little idea of their background, heritage and culture.
Coming from another country myself, I was honestly amazed to hear of the atrocities that occurred in Australia given its positive and laid back characteristics that are well known all over the world. However, these are all negative effects we have seen as a result of globalisation in Australia. Unfortunately as previously stated it remains largely an untold story, however the Australian story also reveals many positives that I have also personally experienced.

In assessing the effects of globalisation in an Australian perspective it is remarkable to look at Aboriginal Australia in 2014, verses pre and post colonisation. Firstly, the Geographical effect of globalisation has can be illustrated by a comparison between pre settlement and post settlement maps. The image below shows the range of Indigenous tribal areas in parallel to the current Australian demographic. As a result we see a loss of Indigenous identity and an intrinsic link to country that is well known as inextricable to their culture.  As a result, we also see an introduction of a state-based demographic system adopted from English backgrounds.

Source:

Subsequent to the ‘Settlement’ of Australia a large amount of Europeans, Germans and Chinese travelled to Australia in hopes of securing financial prosperity as a result of the gold rush. This saw Australia’s cultural mix increase significantly with a range of languages, foods and customs.  This also saw the development of a range of facilities and really kick started the Australian culture we have today. At the same time the Australian dynamic was exposed to racism and discrimination that led to the White Australia policy in 1901 that restricted the migration of non-Europeans.
Immigration to Australia was also heavily experiences post world-war 2 as a result of dispossession in Europe and Australia’s poor economic shortages.  Migration agreements were also established with many countries that really shaped Australia with the development of major facilities such as railway’s and telegraph poles. In essence, Australian migration has largely changed as a result of world issues such as war and poor economic experiences in Australia (immi.gov, 2014).

Now in Australia we have a range of diverse cultures, languages, foods and customers that were largely a result of government pushes in the last 40 years (australiancollaboriation, 2014). We have seen a level of social cohesion, integration and acceptance of peoples that is not as common around the world as we would perhaps like. This has seen Australia’s identity really flourish as Global citizens of the world and made Australia a very envious place to live.

It is also important to note that prior to the English “settlement” of Australia there were pre-existing forms of Globalization that existed without the same losses experienced. The northern end Aboriginal tribes of Australia had experienced trading routes with Asia for many years. During this period several countries travelled to Sulawesi that was seen as a major trading hub. People then travelled to the north of Australia for trade and fishing that saw a large contribution to Northen Aboriginal culture, language and genetics (austhrutime, 2011). This goes to show that Globalisation can actually be achieved without great detriment to our intrinsic level of ethics and without the dispossession of another race.

In the future it will be interesting to see how movements such as the reconciliation movement, close the gap and the First peoples of Australia movement will affect the cultural climate of Australia. In particular it will be interesting to watch how tools such as technology, better health and access to education will allow Indigenous peoples of Australia to leverage ideas of globalisation for positive future outcomes.

In the same way, it will be interesting to see how recent government pushes such as ‘Stop the boats’ will impact on the worldwide perspective of Australia as Global Citizens and will also affect the continuing globalisation process of Australia into the future.
In summary, it has been an interesting process to be able to deduce the fact that globalisation can occur with mutual benefits between peoples and without the mass disadvantage of one person in comparison to the conquests seen throughout the world. In an Australian context, it is also interesting to see how the gains and losses of globalisation have produced the Australia we know today and how it will continue to shape Australia into the future.

For further reading please see the following resources: